← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Laganiere Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-06-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Brockville Braves CCHL 11 2 3 5 0.455 0.1297 0.1369 0.3518 0.3713
2004-05 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 41 13 22 35 0.854 0.2436 0.2465 0.6608 0.6686
2005-06 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 56 28 38 66 1.179 0.3364 0.3255 0.9124 0.8828
2006-07 CCHL 51 19 56 75 1.471 0.4197 0.3853 1.1384 1.0451
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 SUNY Oswego D3 SR 26 10 10 20 0.769
2009-10 SUNY Oswego D3 JR 29 16 30 46 1.586
2008-09 SUNY Oswego D3 SO 22 6 14 20 0.909
2007-08 SUNY Oswego D3 FR 20 2 13 15 0.750
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.75
2007-08 · SUNY Oswego
+142.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7325
Forward overall
#294
Forward born in 1986
#83
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.25 PPG
→ Holy Cross
0.44 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England · 2017-18
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamline · 2014-15
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2008-09
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.