← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Laganiere Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-06-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Brockville Braves CCHL 11 2 3 5 0.455 0.0986 0.1041 0.3516 0.3711
2004-05 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 41 13 22 35 0.854 0.1852 0.1874 0.6605 0.6682
2005-06 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 56 28 38 66 1.179 0.2556 0.2473 0.9119 0.8823
2006-07 CCHL 51 19 56 75 1.471 0.3190 0.2928 1.1378 1.0445
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SR 26 10 10 20 0.769
2009-10 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC JR 29 16 30 46 1.586
2008-09 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SO 22 6 14 20 0.909
2007-08 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC FR 20 2 13 15 0.750
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.75
2007-08 · SUNY Oswego
+219.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9493
Forward overall
#350
Forward born in 1986
#71
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2017-18
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2006-07
0.783 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamline · 2014-15
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.