IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mitchell McPherson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-05-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Texas Tornado NAHL 47 5 9 14 0.298 0.1106 0.1204 0.3154 0.3434
2012-13 Texas Tornado NAHL 59 14 13 27 0.458 0.1699 0.1764 0.4845 0.5031
2013-14 Amarillo Bulls NAHL 60 9 11 20 0.333 0.1238 0.1224 0.3529 0.3488
2014-15 Amarillo Bulls NAHL 16 1 2 3 0.188 0.0696 0.0651 0.1985 0.1858
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Hamline D3 MIAC SR 25 6 4 10 0.400
2017-18 Hamline D3 MIAC JR 25 15 6 21 0.840
2016-17 Hamline D3 MIAC SO 26 9 17 26 1.000
2015-16 Hamline D3 MIAC FR 27 13 14 27 1.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.00
2015-16 · Hamline
+1228.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#38114
Forward overall
#1577
Forward born in 1994
#4903
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chris Rampone
St. Norbert · 2003-04
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Vikich
St. Thomas · 2014-15
0.280 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Caden Pattison
Albertus Magnus · 2021-22
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.