← New Search ↗ Social Card

Peter Falivena Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-05-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 62 13 19 32 0.516 0.1648 0.1679 0.3995 0.4069
2017-18 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 61 17 16 33 0.541 0.1727 0.1670 0.4188 0.4050
2018-19 Trenton Golden Hawks OJHL 48 12 12 24 0.500 0.1502 0.1373 0.3422 0.3129
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Alvernia D3 MAC 20 2 0 2 0.100
2022-23 Alvernia D3 MAC 23 6 6 12 0.522
2019-20 Bryn Athyn D1 FR 19 4 3 7 0.368
2019-20 Bryn Athyn D3 FR 19 4 3 7 0.368
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2019-20 · Bryn Athyn
+188.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#34786
Forward overall
#1750
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Buffalo State · 2017-18
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2010-11
0.353 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2017-18
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.