← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Brenton Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-05-17 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2007-08 Kemptville 73's CCHL 38 3 3 6 0.158 0.0451 0.0481 0.1222 0.1303
2008-09 Kemptville 73's CCHL 47 10 5 15 0.319 0.0911 0.0918 0.2470 0.2489
2009-10 Kemptville 73's CCHL 60 19 27 46 0.767 0.2188 0.2103 0.5935 0.5706
2010-11 Kemptville 73's CCHL 60 32 21 53 0.883 0.2521 0.2299 0.6838 0.6236
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SR 19 8 5 13 0.684
2013-14 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 JR 20 12 2 14 0.700
2012-13 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SO 20 8 4 12 0.600
2011-12 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 FR 17 4 2 6 0.353
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2011-12 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+85.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19561
Forward overall
#809
Forward born in 1990
#577
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Augsburg · 2014-15
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Arcadia · 2021-22
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2003-04
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.