← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Brenton Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-05-17 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2007-08 Kemptville 73's CCHL 38 3 3 6 0.158 0.0342 0.0365 0.1222 0.1303
2008-09 Kemptville 73's CCHL 47 10 5 15 0.319 0.0692 0.0697 0.2469 0.2488
2009-10 Kemptville 73's CCHL 60 19 27 46 0.767 0.1663 0.1599 0.5932 0.5703
2010-11 Kemptville 73's CCHL 60 32 21 53 0.883 0.1916 0.1747 0.6834 0.6232
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC SR 19 8 5 13 0.684
2013-14 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC JR 20 12 2 14 0.700
2012-13 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC SO 20 8 4 12 0.600
2011-12 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC FR 17 4 2 6 0.353
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2011-12 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+144.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#24128
Forward overall
#903
Forward born in 1990
#484
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2024-25
0.474 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2023-24
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2024-25
0.579 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.