IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mathieu MacMillan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-05-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Powassan VooDoos NOJHL 41 12 16 28 0.683 0.1737 0.1775 0.2833 0.2894
2023-24 Powassan VooDoos NOJHL 52 25 48 73 1.404 0.3570 0.3461 0.5824 0.5646
2024-25 Burlington Cougars OJHL 54 31 40 71 1.315 0.3950 0.3618 0.9000 0.8244
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Utica D3 UCHC FR 19 4 5 9 0.474
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.47
2025-26 · Utica
+55.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12921
Forward overall
#585
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nicholas Bennett
Elmira · 2024-25
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hassan Akl
Aurora · 2021-22
0.931 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucas Michaud
Trinity · 2017-18
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.