IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

John Moncovich Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-04-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Hampton Roads Whalers USPHL-Elite 44 50 33 83 1.886 0.2262 0.2321 0.4331 0.4445
2017-18 — NAHL 9 1 0 1 0.111 0.0413 0.0406 0.1176 0.1156
2018-19 Hampton Roads Whalers USPHL-Premier 40 31 21 52 1.300 0.1750 0.1620 0.4425 0.4097
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Utica D3 UCHC SR 27 12 9 21 0.778
2021-22 Utica D3 UCHC JR 29 19 17 36 1.241
2020-21 Utica D3 UCHC SO 10 5 7 12 1.200
2019-20 Utica D3 UCHC FR 22 9 10 19 0.864
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.86
2019-20 · Utica
+789.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23640
Forward overall
#963
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dillon Steh
Becker · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Brent Bisdee
SUNY Geneseo · 2011-12
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Saler
St. Scholastica · 2004-05
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.