IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tucker Tone Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-04-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Midwest Blackbirds USPHL-Premier 32 7 1 8 0.250 0.0824 0.0890 0.0851 0.0919
2022-23 Fort Wayne Spacemen USPHL-Premier 40 5 5 10 0.250 0.0824 0.0849 0.0851 0.0877
2023-24 Fort Wayne Spacemen USPHL-Premier 37 14 18 32 0.865 0.2851 0.2800 0.2942 0.2889
2024-25 Fort Wayne Spacemen USPHL-Premier 41 21 21 42 1.024 0.3376 0.3118 0.3485 0.3219
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Rivier D3 MASCAC — 4 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19580
Forward overall
#1029
Forward born in 2004
#1305
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lionel Mauron
Curry · 2014-15
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Joe Harren
St. John's · 2008-09
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Kelly
St. Norbert · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.