IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tanner Pond Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-05-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 53 4 4 8 0.151 0.0961 0.1010 0.4522 0.4754
2011-12 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 27 4 7 11 0.407 0.2594 0.2606 1.2209 1.2266
2012-13 — USHL 57 13 9 22 0.386 0.2458 0.2339 1.1567 1.1005
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast SR 38 1 2 3 0.079
2015-16 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast JR 24 3 2 5 0.208
2014-15 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast SO 10 0 0 0 0.000
2013-14 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast FR 37 1 3 4 0.108
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2013-14 · Northeastern
-48.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18258
Forward overall
#688
Forward born in 1993
#2614
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Alfred Larsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
Robin Höglund
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joe Anderson
Wisconsin-Stout · 2013-14
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Marinac
SUNY Brockport · 2011-12
0.905 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Catanzaro
SUNY Cortland · 2002-03
0.958 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.