IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joe Anderson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-06-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 30 1 2 3 0.100 0.0371 0.0386 0.1059 0.1102
2013-14 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 7 0 1 1 0.143 0.0531 0.0526 0.1513 0.1498
2014-15 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 57 14 14 28 0.491 0.1824 0.1711 0.5201 0.4877
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen SO 11 3 1 4 0.364
2015-16 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen FR 24 6 9 15 0.625
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2015-16 · Wisconsin-Stout
+490.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#26206
Forward overall
#1058
Forward born in 1994
#2939
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Donovan Hall
Neumann · 2004-05
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Corey Domenico
SUNY Oswego · 2009-10
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan Isley
Wisconsin-Superior · 2006-07
0.815 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.