IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Logan Isley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-05-23 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Bonnyville Pontiacs AJHL 7 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2004-05 — AJHL 61 10 9 19 0.311 0.1040 0.1062 0.2892 0.2953
2005-06 Fort Saskatchewan Traders AJHL 60 10 24 34 0.567 0.1893 0.1843 0.5261 0.5122
2006-07 — AJHL 42 14 11 25 0.595 0.1988 0.1844 0.5525 0.5124
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Wisconsin-Superior D3 — SR 26 3 8 11 0.423
2009-10 Wisconsin-Superior D3 — JR 27 5 11 16 0.593
2008-09 Wisconsin-Superior D3 — SO 30 13 16 29 0.967
2007-08 Wisconsin-Superior D3 — FR 27 11 11 22 0.815
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.81
2007-08 · Wisconsin-Superior
+416.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#23769
Forward overall
#917
Forward born in 1986
#1274
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jesse Facchini
SUNY Brockport · 2011-12
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeff Thompson
Connecticut College · 2015-16
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Guiney
Concordia Wisconsin · 2016-17
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.