← New Search ↗ Social Card

Logan Isley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-05-23 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Bonnyville Pontiacs AJHL 7 0 0 0 0.000
2004-05 AJHL 61 10 9 19 0.311 0.1045 0.1067 0.2883 0.2944
2005-06 Fort Saskatchewan Traders AJHL 60 10 24 34 0.567 0.1901 0.1851 0.5244 0.5105
2006-07 AJHL 42 14 11 25 0.595 0.1996 0.1851 0.5508 0.5109
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SR 26 3 8 11 0.423
2009-10 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC JR 27 5 11 16 0.593
2008-09 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SO 30 13 16 29 0.967
2007-08 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC FR 27 11 11 22 0.815
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.81
2007-08 · Wisconsin-Superior
+414.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#32850
Forward overall
#1075
Forward born in 1986
#1071
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Salem State · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2016-17
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2011-12
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.