| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-09 | Toronto Patriots | OJHL | 31 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 0.516 | 0.1265 | 0.1341 | 0.3553 | 0.3767 |
| 2009-10 | Toronto Patriots | OJHL | 44 | 4 | 12 | 16 | 0.364 | 0.0891 | 0.0898 | 0.2503 | 0.2522 |
| 2010-11 | Mississauga Chargers | OJHL | 44 | 24 | 20 | 44 | 1.000 | 0.2451 | 0.2356 | 0.6885 | 0.6618 |
| 2011-12 | Mississauga Chargers | OJHL | 40 | 10 | 17 | 27 | 0.675 | 0.1654 | 0.1517 | 0.4647 | 0.4261 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 | SUNY Brockport | D3 | SUNYAC | SR | 26 | 6 | 3 | 9 | 0.346 |
| 2014-15 | SUNY Brockport | D3 | SUNYAC | JR | 26 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 0.308 |
| 2013-14 | SUNY Brockport | D3 | SUNYAC | SO | 25 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 0.440 |
| 2012-13 | SUNY Brockport | D3 | SUNYAC | FR | 25 | 3 | 16 | 19 | 0.760 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.