IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jesse Facchini Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-05-31 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Toronto Patriots OJHL 31 7 9 16 0.516 0.1442 0.1529 0.3562 0.3777
2009-10 Toronto Patriots OJHL 44 4 12 16 0.364 0.1016 0.1024 0.2509 0.2528
2010-11 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 44 24 20 44 1.000 0.2794 0.2686 0.6901 0.6633
2011-12 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 40 10 17 27 0.675 0.1886 0.1729 0.4658 0.4271
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 SUNY Brockport D3 — SR 26 6 3 9 0.346
2014-15 SUNY Brockport D3 — JR 26 3 5 8 0.308
2013-14 SUNY Brockport D3 — SO 25 5 6 11 0.440
2012-13 SUNY Brockport D3 — FR 25 3 16 19 0.760
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.76
2012-13 · SUNY Brockport
+320.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20515
Forward overall
#807
Forward born in 1991
#1540
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Amit Grumet-Morris
Becker · 2010-11
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Alarie
Morrisville · 2005-06
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brayden Kolisniak
Wisconsin-Superior · 2007-08
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.