← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jesse Facchini Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-05-31 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Toronto Patriots OJHL 31 7 9 16 0.516 0.1265 0.1341 0.3553 0.3767
2009-10 Toronto Patriots OJHL 44 4 12 16 0.364 0.0891 0.0898 0.2503 0.2522
2010-11 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 44 24 20 44 1.000 0.2451 0.2356 0.6885 0.6618
2011-12 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 40 10 17 27 0.675 0.1654 0.1517 0.4647 0.4261
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC SR 26 6 3 9 0.346
2014-15 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC JR 26 3 5 8 0.308
2013-14 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC SO 25 5 6 11 0.440
2012-13 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC FR 25 3 16 19 0.760
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.76
2012-13 · SUNY Brockport
+379.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#26577
Forward overall
#952
Forward born in 1991
#1265
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Skidmore · 2024-25
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Becker · 2010-11
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Morrisville · 2005-06
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.