← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Guiney Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-06-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 29 1 5 6 0.207 0.0805 0.0832 0.3017 0.3120
2015-16 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 55 11 11 22 0.400 0.1557 0.1527 0.5833 0.5720
2016-17 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 50 15 20 35 0.700 0.2724 0.2532 1.0208 0.9488
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 21 13 12 25 1.190
2020-21 Concordia Wisconsin D3 SR 21 13 12 25 1.190
2019-20 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 21 11 8 19 0.905
2019-20 Concordia Wisconsin D3 JR 21 11 8 19 0.905
2018-19 Concordia D3 MIAC SO 23 7 18 25 1.087
2018-19 Concordia Wisconsin D3 SO 23 7 18 25 1.087
2017-18 Concordia D3 MIAC FR 26 5 14 19 0.731
2017-18 Concordia Wisconsin D3 FR 26 5 14 19 0.731
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.73
2017-18 · Concordia
+300.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21270
Forward overall
#885
Forward born in 1996
#1914
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Marian · 2008-09
1.148 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
0.905 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2002-03
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.