IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ian Ecklund Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-05-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Alexandria Blizzard NA3HL 48 33 38 71 1.479 0.1782 0.1724 0.4673 0.4520
2013-14 Alexandria Blizzard NA3HL 43 28 50 78 1.814 0.2186 0.2030 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen SR 27 17 9 26 0.963
2016-17 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen JR 16 2 15 17 1.062
2015-16 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen SO 27 10 19 29 1.074
2014-15 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen FR 27 7 7 14 0.518
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2014-15 · Wisconsin-Superior
+217.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19960
Forward overall
#763
Forward born in 1993

D1 Comparables

Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Robin Höglund
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Riley Meyer
Hamline · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Devine
Saint Anselm · 2021-22
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
David Titanic
SUNY Oswego · 2009-10
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.