IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Riley Meyer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-05-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Mason City Toros NA3HL 27 6 14 20 0.741 0.0930 0.0957 0.2338 0.2405
2016-17 — NA3HL 47 25 28 53 1.128 0.1415 0.1384 0.3560 0.3482
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Hamline D3 MIAC GR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Hamline D1 MIAC SR 5 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Hamline D3 MIAC SR 5 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Hamline D1 MIAC JR 23 4 1 5 0.217
2019-20 Hamline D3 MIAC JR 23 4 1 5 0.217
2018-19 Hamline D1 MIAC SO 23 0 2 2 0.087
2018-19 Hamline D3 MIAC SO 23 0 2 2 0.087
2017-18 Hamline D3 MIAC FR 9 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#25057
Forward overall
#1124
Forward born in 1997
#698
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Panayioti Efraimidis
St. Olaf · 2022-23
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Trevor Cear
UMass Dartmouth · 2018-19
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
J.J. Ganss
Tufts · 2013-14
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.