IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trevor Cear Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-05-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Connecticut Nor'Easter EHL 3 1 0 1 0.333 0.0770 0.0809 0.1631 0.1714
2018-19 New Jersey 87's EHL 40 3 18 21 0.525 0.1213 0.1214 0.2569 0.2570
2019-20 New Jersey 87's EHL 42 3 34 37 0.881 0.2035 0.2035 0.4311 0.4311
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 UMass Dartmouth D1 HockeyEast FR 3 1 1 2 0.667
2020-21 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast FR 3 1 1 2 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2020-21 · UMass Dartmouth
+571.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
45%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5177
Defenseman overall
#1170
Defenseman born in 1999
#577
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Victor Björkung
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Austin Jackson
Wisconsin-Stout · 2014-15
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Roe
Worcester State · 2016-17
0.231 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Aaron Swanson
St. Thomas · 2018-19
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.