IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Austin Jackson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-05-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Mason City Toros NA3HL 31 10 16 26 0.839 0.1053 0.1081 0.2648 0.2719
2014-15 Minnesota Magicians NAHL 27 2 5 7 0.259 0.0953 0.0939 0.2737 0.2698
2015-16 Mason City Toros NA3HL 39 31 31 62 1.590 0.1995 0.1854 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Wisconsin-Stout D1 BigTen JR 19 6 2 8 0.421
2018-19 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen JR 19 6 2 8 0.421
2017-18 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen SO 20 4 5 9 0.450
2016-17 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen FR 18 3 1 4 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2016-17 · Wisconsin-Stout
+74.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20212
Forward overall
#759
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alex Brenton
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2009-10
0.353 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cameron Bullinger
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2023-24
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brayden Sampson
Aurora · 2016-17
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.