IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Johnny Hrabovsky Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-03-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Tri-City Storm USHL 56 0 10 10 0.179 0.1137 0.1131 0.5352 0.5323
2012-13 Tri-City Storm USHL 55 4 9 13 0.236 0.1505 0.1417 0.7084 0.6669
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Air Force D1 AHA SR 33 1 7 8 0.242
2015-16 Air Force D1 AHA JR 36 7 8 15 0.417
2014-15 Air Force D1 AHA SO 31 3 7 10 0.323
2013-14 Air Force D1 AHA FR 39 2 8 10 0.256
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2013-14 · Air Force
+108.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8333
Defenseman overall
#1189
Defenseman born in 1993
#3583
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Vinny Muto
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Nick Hinz
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Alaska
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.09 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Max Everson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Frankie DeAugustine
UMass Boston · 2010-11
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Derek Lynden
Manhattanville · 2004-05
0.529 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Carney
Bowdoin · 2009-10
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.