← New Search ↗ Social Card

Derek Lynden Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-03-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Pickering Panthers OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2001-02 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 6 0 0 0 0.000
2002-03 Bowmanville Eagles OJHL 14 1 2 3 0.214 0.0599 0.0616 0.1479 0.1520
2003-04 Pickering Panthers OJHL 47 12 25 37 0.787 0.2199 0.2162 0.5432 0.5340
2004-05 Pickering Panthers OJHL 39 22 27 49 1.256 0.3510 0.3273 0.8670 0.8085
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Manhattanville D3 SR 23 8 6 14 0.609
2007-08 Manhattanville D3 JR 26 5 8 13 0.500
2006-07 Manhattanville D3 SO 24 12 9 21 0.875
2005-06 Manhattanville D3 FR 17 4 5 9 0.529
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.53
2005-06 · Manhattanville
+118.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15316
Forward overall
#562
Forward born in 1985
#959
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Miami (0.71 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Superior · 2014-15
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2013-14
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2000-01
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.