IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nicholas Gray Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-03-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Potomac Patriots USPHL-Elite 40 26 24 50 1.250 0.0931 0.0909 0.2864 0.2796
2015-16 Hartford Jr. Wolfpack EHL 35 19 13 32 0.914 0.1338 0.1261 0.4483 0.4226
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Stevenson D3 MAC — 26 20 10 30 1.154
2018-19 Stevenson D3 MAC — 24 8 3 11 0.458
2017-18 Stevenson D3 MAC — 24 5 12 17 0.708
2016-17 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE — 23 10 5 15 0.652
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.65
2016-17 · Johnson & Wales
+580.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17670
Forward overall
#683
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joseph Sposit
Nichols · 2010-11
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brock Krulicki
SUNY Oswego · 2022-23
0.450 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dakota Mason
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2012-13
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.