Jaden Condotta Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-03-07 Country: Canada

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2016-17	Georgetown Raiders	OJHL	3	0	2	2	0.667	0.1634	0.1884	0.4590	0.5291
2017-18	Georgetown Raiders	OJHL	54	0	15	15	0.278	0.0681	0.0752	0.1913	0.2113
2018-19	Georgetown Raiders	OJHL	55	2	11	13	0.236	0.0579	0.0611	0.1628	0.1719
2019-20	Georgetown Raiders	OJHL	53	1	30	31	0.585	0.1434	0.1434	0.4027	0.4027
2020-21	Georgetown Raiders	OJHL	0	0	0	0	0.000	—	—	—	—
2021-22	North York Rangers	OJHL	53	9	34	43	0.811	0.1988	0.1809	0.5586	0.5083
2023-24	Toronto Metro Univ.	USports-M	5	1	2	3	0.600	0.3166	0.3218	1.7586	1.7875
2024-25	Toronto Metro Univ.	USports-M	28	5	18	23	0.821	0.4334	0.4197	2.4075	2.3314

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2022-23	Aurora	D3	NCHA	—	29	6	9	15	0.517

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.13

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.52

2022-23 · Aurora

+312.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

98%

Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2835

Defenseman overall

#662

Defenseman born in 2001

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Woodward

SUNY Oswego · 2002-03

1.226 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Donny Flynn

Wilkes · 2016-17

1.423 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Lucas Signoretti

Buffalo State · 2024-25

1.120 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.