IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Woodward Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1982-01-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Wellington Dukes OJHL 49 28 47 75 1.531 0.4276 0.4112 1.0563 1.0158
2001-02 Wellington Dukes OJHL 43 31 40 71 1.651 0.4613 0.4198 1.1395 1.0370
2002-03 Wellington Dukes OJHL 48 38 51 89 1.854 0.5181 0.4501 1.2796 1.1116
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2006-07 SUNY Oswego D3 — SR 29 9 15 24 0.828
2005-06 SUNY Oswego D3 — JR 27 23 24 47 1.741
2004-05 SUNY Oswego D3 — SO 27 14 22 36 1.333
2003-04 SUNY Oswego D3 — FR 31 12 26 38 1.226
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.37
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.23
2003-04 · SUNY Oswego
+227.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3160
Forward overall
#131
Forward born in 1982
#20
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Trevor Mingoia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Perry D'Arrisso
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

George Thurston
Southern New Hampshire · 2018-19
0.909 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Reed
Curry · 2010-11
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Carlson
Wilkes · 2021-22
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.