IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jordan Reed Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-01-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Ajax Attack OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2007-08 Ajax Attack OJHL 4 0 1 1 0.250 0.0613 0.0639 0.1721 0.1794
2008-09 Ajax Attack OJHL 44 13 17 30 0.682 0.1671 0.1657 0.4694 0.4654
2009-10 Ajax Attack OJHL 49 38 53 91 1.857 0.4552 0.4274 1.2786 1.2005
2010-11 — OJHL 46 18 39 57 1.239 0.3037 0.2710 0.8531 0.7612
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Curry D3 CNE SR 25 22 12 34 1.360
2013-14 Curry D3 CNE JR 20 7 1 8 0.400
2012-13 Curry D3 CNE SO 24 8 13 21 0.875
2011-12 Curry D3 CNE FR 26 8 15 23 0.885
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.88
2011-12 · Curry
+209.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9614
Forward overall
#404
Forward born in 1990
#152
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Logan Lemirande
Lawrence · 2011-12
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Glynn Robitaille
Manhattanville · 2018-19
0.565 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Keyes
Aurora · 2018-19
1.259 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.