IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Logan Lemirande Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-01-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Port Huron Fighting Falcons NAHL 50 10 9 19 0.380 0.1396 0.1358 0.4011 0.3902
2011-12 Port Huron Fighting Falcons NAHL 50 17 18 35 0.700 0.2572 0.2375 0.7389 0.6823
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC — 22 3 12 15 0.682
2014-15 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC — 18 3 9 12 0.667
2013-14 Lawrence D3 NCHA — 24 5 10 15 0.625
2012-13 Lawrence D3 NCHA — 25 7 20 27 1.080
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.08
2012-13 · Lawrence
+540.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#24187
Forward overall
#877
Forward born in 1991
#1876
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alain Joanette
St. Norbert · 2007-08
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Guzzo
Curry · 2007-08
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan Kelly
Canton · 2023-24
0.933 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.