IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Guzzo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-01-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Chicago Steel USHL 14 1 0 1 0.071 0.0455 0.0453 0.2140 0.2129
2006-07 Penticton Vees BCHL 56 35 32 67 1.196 0.4656 0.4454 1.7447 1.6689
2007-08 Penticton Vees BCHL 60 22 26 48 0.800 0.3114 0.2811 1.1666 1.0530
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Curry D3 — JR 9 4 3 7 0.778
2010-11 Finlandia D3 — JR 7 0 1 1 0.143
2009-10 Curry D3 — SO 22 7 3 10 0.455
2008-09 Curry D3 — FR 27 12 11 23 0.852
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.85
2008-09 · Curry
+186.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10469
Forward overall
#439
Forward born in 1987

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Perry D'Arrisso
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Max Rasberg
New England · 2016-17
0.964 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Volonnino
Plymouth State · 2014-15
1.056 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Zack Bross
UMass Boston · 2016-17
1.518 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.