IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Volonnino Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-02-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Chicago Steel USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2012-13 — NAHL 48 10 11 21 0.438 0.1624 0.1664 0.4632 0.4745
2014-15 Jersey Hitmen USPHL-Premier-Classic 48 22 26 48 1.000 0.3003 0.2828 0.8237 0.7756
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SR 28 19 20 39 1.393
2017-18 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast JR 21 14 11 25 1.190
2016-17 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SO 15 6 13 19 1.267
2015-16 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast FR 18 10 9 19 1.056
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.06
2015-16 · Plymouth State
+422.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15272
Forward overall
#631
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Perry D'Arrisso
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chase Nieuwendyk
SUNY Brockport · 2011-12
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Johnson
Saint John's · 2018-19
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Robert Clerc
SUNY Potsdam · 2017-18
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.