IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chase Nieuwendyk Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1991-01-03 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Brampton Capitals OJHL 48 12 27 39 0.812 0.2270 0.2361 0.5607 0.5831
2009-10 Brampton Capitals OJHL 50 24 24 48 0.960 0.2682 0.2648 0.6625 0.6542
2010-11 Brampton Capitals OJHL 50 22 31 53 1.060 0.2962 0.2787 0.7315 0.6883
2011-12 Trenton Golden Hawks OJHL 49 27 30 57 1.163 0.3250 0.2914 0.8028 0.7199
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 SUNY Brockport D3 — SR 26 14 23 37 1.423
2014-15 SUNY Brockport D3 — JR 26 18 12 30 1.154
2013-14 SUNY Brockport D3 — SO 25 8 16 24 0.960
2012-13 SUNY Brockport D3 — FR 15 5 5 10 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2012-13 · SUNY Brockport
+146.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#1358
Defenseman overall
#400
Defenseman born in 1991
#465
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
John Rey
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Casey Nelson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jordan Bancroft
Concordia · 2011-12
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Gage Christianson
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2012-13
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Clint Olson
SUNY Geneseo · 2007-08
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.