IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jordan Bancroft Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-03-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Janesville Jets NAHL 49 8 13 21 0.429 0.1575 0.1620 0.4524 0.4652
2011-12 Janesville Jets NAHL 60 24 27 51 0.850 0.3123 0.2899 0.8972 0.8327
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 26 12 8 20 0.769
2014-15 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 26 15 11 26 1.000
2013-14 Concordia D3 MIAC SO 26 9 18 27 1.038
2012-13 Concordia D3 MIAC FR 26 12 10 22 0.846
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.85
2012-13 · Concordia
+314.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18851
Forward overall
#698
Forward born in 1991
#1163
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jake Russell
Assumption · 2024-25
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Dale Lupul
Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
0.759 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Derek Hansberry
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2004-05
1.259 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.