IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dale Lupul Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1980-02-14 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 60 13 53 66 1.100 0.4238 0.3830 1.6008 1.4467
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2004-05 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SR 27 3 26 29 1.074
2003-04 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC JR 21 5 20 25 1.190
2002-03 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SO 27 7 15 22 0.815
2001-02 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC FR 29 5 17 22 0.759
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.36
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.76
2001-02 · Wisconsin-Superior
+109.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#1738
Defenseman overall
#240
Defenseman born in 1980
#190
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Paul LaDue
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Van Voorhis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Barrett Kaib
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Fleming
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Devin Panzeca
SUNY Potsdam · 2017-18
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Inger
New England College · 2017-18
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Rudek
Franklin Pierce · 2018-19
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.