IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Taylor Fleming Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-02-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Fargo Force USHL 55 3 7 10 0.182 0.1158 0.1147 0.5448 0.5397
2012-13 Fargo Force USHL 63 12 18 30 0.476 0.3032 0.2842 1.4270 1.3376
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Western Michigan D1 NCHC SR 39 2 17 19 0.487
2015-16 Western Michigan D1 NCHC JR 24 0 6 6 0.250
2014-15 Western Michigan D1 NCHC SO 37 2 13 15 0.405
2013-14 Western Michigan D1 NCHC FR 40 1 6 7 0.175
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2013-14 · Western Michigan
-14.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3133
Defenseman overall
#646
Defenseman born in 1993
#2500
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Victor Newell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Harvard (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Barrett Kaib
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Connor Murphy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Cornell (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Max Everson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Geoff Fortman
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Canisius (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Robbie Murden
Hamilton · 2011-12
1.091 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick Noonan
Southern Maine · 2021-22
1.133 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
David Szmyd
SUNY Geneseo · 2015-16
1.074 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.