IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Robbie Murden Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-03-26 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 — OJHL 48 8 7 15 0.312 0.0766 0.0803 0.2152 0.2257
2010-11 Toronto Patriots OJHL 40 21 29 50 1.250 0.3064 0.3071 0.8606 0.8625
2011-12 Toronto Patriots OJHL 49 25 35 60 1.224 0.3001 0.2875 0.8431 0.8078
2012-13 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 53 25 33 58 1.094 0.2682 0.2436 0.7534 0.6843
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SR 20 7 7 14 0.700
2015-16 Hamilton D3 NESCAC JR 25 17 16 33 1.320
2014-15 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SO 25 15 17 32 1.280
2013-14 Hamilton D3 NESCAC FR 22 11 13 24 1.091
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.09
2013-14 · Hamilton
+387.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12050
Forward overall
#485
Forward born in 1992
#273
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Marinac
SUNY Brockport · 2012-13
0.905 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Peter Rodrigues
SUNY Oswego · 2010-11
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Faliero
SUNY Cortland · 2016-17
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.