IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Marinac Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-04-07 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Streetsville Derbys (OLD) OJHL 49 16 21 37 0.755 0.1851 0.1944 0.5199 0.5461
2010-11 — OJHL 50 23 30 53 1.060 0.2598 0.2608 0.7298 0.7326
2011-12 Cobourg Cougars OJHL 47 25 32 57 1.213 0.2973 0.2853 0.8350 0.8014
2012-13 Trenton Golden Hawks OJHL 45 10 24 34 0.756 0.1852 0.1685 0.5202 0.4733
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC FR 21 5 14 19 0.905
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.90
2013-14 · SUNY Brockport
+391.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16935
Forward overall
#646
Forward born in 1992

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jake McAlpine
Wisconsin-Stout · 2022-23
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan McCarthy
Hamline · 2002-03
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Hoogenboom
St. Norbert · 2009-10
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.