IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Marinac Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-04-07 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Streetsville Derbys (OLD) OJHL 49 16 21 37 0.755 0.2110 0.2216 0.5211 0.5474
2010-11 — OJHL 50 23 30 53 1.060 0.2962 0.2974 0.7315 0.7343
2011-12 Cobourg Cougars OJHL 47 25 32 57 1.213 0.3389 0.3252 0.8370 0.8033
2012-13 Trenton Golden Hawks OJHL 45 10 24 34 0.756 0.2111 0.1921 0.5214 0.4744
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 SUNY Brockport D3 — FR 21 5 14 19 0.905
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.90
2013-14 · SUNY Brockport
+330.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12675
Forward overall
#554
Forward born in 1992

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jake McAlpine
Wisconsin-Stout · 2022-23
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Beer
Morrisville · 2010-11
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan McCarthy
Hamline · 2002-03
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.