IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake McAlpine Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-04-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Minnesota Blue Ox USPHL-Premier 42 24 31 55 1.310 0.1713 0.1713 0.4444 0.4444
2021-22 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs NCDC 42 12 6 18 0.429 0.1747 0.1722 0.3445 0.3396
2022-23 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs NCDC 25 16 6 22 0.880 0.3588 0.3387 0.7073 0.6677
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC JR 30 6 1 7 0.233
2024-25 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC SO 21 3 6 9 0.429
2023-24 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC FR 24 10 3 13 0.542
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.54
2023-24 · Wisconsin-Stout
+132.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2524
Forward overall
#82
Forward born in 2002
#15
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Noah Trathen
UMass Dartmouth · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Cann
Elmira · 2004-05
0.786 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
George Splichal
Bethel · 2014-15
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.