IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Cann Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1984-05-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Oakville Blades OJHL 48 1 7 8 0.167 0.0466 0.0503 0.1150 0.1242
2001-02 Oakville Blades OJHL 45 6 26 32 0.711 0.1987 0.2043 0.4907 0.5045
2002-03 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 55 5 11 16 0.291 0.0840 0.0868 0.2190 0.2263
2003-04 Port Hope Predators OJHL 46 8 21 29 0.630 0.1761 0.1658 0.4350 0.4097
2004-05 Port Hope Predators OJHL 47 17 23 40 0.851 0.2378 0.2120 0.5873 0.5235
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2005-06 Elmira D3 — FR 28 5 17 22 0.786
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.79
2005-06 · Elmira
+330.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#4944
Defenseman overall
#770
Defenseman born in 1984
#1775
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
John Rey
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brendan Kennedy
Babson · 2021-22
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Will Bruce
Williams · 2003-04
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Zizek
SUNY Oswego · 2015-16
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.