← New Search ↗ Social Card

Noah Bradley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-04-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Philadelphia Jr. Flyers EHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Philadelphia Revolution EHL 14 0 4 4 0.286 0.0613 0.0646 0.1399 0.1474
2017-18 Philadelphia Revolution EHL 44 16 22 38 0.864 0.1853 0.1850 0.4229 0.4221
2018-19 Philadelphia Revolution EHL 43 21 19 40 0.930 0.1996 0.1892 0.4555 0.4318
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Manhattanville D3 UCHC GR 26 3 3 6 0.231
2022-23 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SR 23 1 5 6 0.261
2021-22 Manhattanville D3 UCHC JR 21 1 2 3 0.143
2020-21 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SO 2 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Manhattanville D3 UCHC FR 25 5 9 14 0.560
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2019-20 · Manhattanville
+248.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

57%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25412
Forward overall
#1048
Forward born in 1998
#367
in EHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2005-06
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2005-06
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint John's · 2018-19
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.