IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brendan Kennedy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-05-23 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 — OJHL 53 9 6 15 0.283 0.0791 0.0791 0.1953 0.1953
2020-21 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Utica Jr. Comets NCDC 49 12 25 37 0.755 0.2128 0.2005 0.6113 0.5760
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Babson D3 LittleEast SR 27 8 10 18 0.667
2024-25 Babson D3 LittleEast JR 24 12 5 17 0.708
2023-24 Babson D3 LittleEast SO 26 2 13 15 0.577
2022-23 Babson D3 LittleEast FR 23 8 8 16 0.696
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.70
2022-23 · Babson
+305.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26349
Forward overall
#1018
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kyle Luschinski
St. Scholastica · 2004-05
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Sebastian Panetta
SUNY Geneseo · 2005-06
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dom Kuziak
Castleton · 2016-17
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.