IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sebastian Panetta Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-05-23 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Nepean Raiders CCHL 14 0 1 1 0.071 0.0155 0.0163 0.0552 0.0581
2003-04 Rockland Nationals CCHL 53 1 12 13 0.245 0.0532 0.0533 0.1898 0.1903
2004-05 Rockland Nationals CCHL 54 36 20 56 1.037 0.2249 0.2156 0.8023 0.7691
2005-06 Nepean Raiders CCHL 58 18 36 54 0.931 0.2019 0.1846 0.7203 0.6586
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC SR 24 5 7 12 0.500
2008-09 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC JR 27 7 16 23 0.852
2007-08 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC SO 20 1 5 6 0.300
2006-07 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC FR 26 9 7 16 0.615
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2006-07 · SUNY Geneseo
+265.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20476
Forward overall
#652
Forward born in 1985
#372
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Redmon
Augsburg · 2018-19
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Thompson
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2004-05
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jaden Davis
Aurora · 2024-25
1.031 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.