IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sebastian Panetta Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-05-23 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Nepean Raiders CCHL 14 0 1 1 0.071 0.0204 0.0215 0.0553 0.0582
2003-04 Rockland Nationals CCHL 53 1 12 13 0.245 0.0700 0.0702 0.1899 0.1904
2004-05 Rockland Nationals CCHL 54 36 20 56 1.037 0.2960 0.2838 0.8027 0.7695
2005-06 Nepean Raiders CCHL 58 18 36 54 0.931 0.2657 0.2429 0.7207 0.6590
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 SUNY Geneseo D3 — SR 24 5 7 12 0.500
2008-09 SUNY Geneseo D3 — JR 27 7 16 23 0.852
2007-08 SUNY Geneseo D3 — SO 20 1 5 6 0.300
2006-07 SUNY Geneseo D3 — FR 26 9 7 16 0.615
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2006-07 · SUNY Geneseo
+177.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16593
Forward overall
#628
Forward born in 1985
#449
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Redmon
Augsburg · 2018-19
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Thompson
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2004-05
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Larry Jungwirth
Aurora · 2017-18
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.