← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Thompson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-06-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 OJHL 45 8 11 19 0.422 0.1035 0.1120 0.2907 0.3147
2001-02 North Bay Centennials OHL 52 4 3 7 0.135 0.0779 0.0823 0.3459 0.3653
2002-03 Saginaw Spirit OHL 30 2 4 6 0.200 0.1157 0.1166 0.5139 0.5177
2003-04 Wellington Dukes OJHL 39 8 15 23 0.590 0.1445 0.1365
2004-05 Cornwall Colts CCHL 19 6 11 17 0.895 0.1941 0.1766 0.6922 0.6298
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA SR 27 3 7 10 0.370
2012-13 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA JR 29 3 16 19 0.655
2011-12 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA SO 30 4 8 12 0.400
2010-11 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA FR 27 7 13 20 0.741
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.74
2010-11 · Milwaukee School of Engineering
+439.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#28537
Forward overall
#824
Forward born in 1984
#1431
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Fitchburg State · 2017-18
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Augsburg · 2014-15
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Keene State · 2023-24
0.579 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.