← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Thompson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-06-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 OJHL 45 8 11 19 0.422 0.1180 0.1277 0.2914 0.3154
2001-02 North Bay Centennials OHL 52 4 3 7 0.135 0.0803 0.0848 0.3486 0.3681
2002-03 Saginaw Spirit OHL 30 2 4 6 0.200 0.1194 0.1203 0.5180 0.5219
2003-04 Wellington Dukes OJHL 39 8 15 23 0.590 0.1648 0.1556
2004-05 Cornwall Colts CCHL 19 6 11 17 0.895 0.2553 0.2323 0.6926 0.6302
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 SR 27 3 7 10 0.370
2012-13 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 JR 29 3 16 19 0.655
2011-12 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 SO 30 4 8 12 0.400
2010-11 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 FR 27 7 13 20 0.741
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.74
2010-11 · Milwaukee School of Engineering
+329.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22591
Forward overall
#775
Forward born in 1984
#1795
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Augsburg · 2014-15
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Babson · 2021-22
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Anna Maria · 2018-19
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.