IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eric Brenk Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-04-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 43 2 5 7 0.163 0.0960 0.1008 0.4890 0.5136
2012-13 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 59 22 22 44 0.746 0.2740 0.2838 0.7872 0.8153
2013-14 — NAHL 61 21 22 43 0.705 0.2590 0.2553 0.7440 0.7332
2014-15 Jersey Hitmen USPHL-Premier-Classic 48 22 32 54 1.125 0.3158 0.3010 0.9250 0.8816
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Augsburg D1 MIAC SR 25 8 15 23 0.920
2018-19 Augsburg D3 MIAC SR 25 8 15 23 0.920
2017-18 Augsburg D3 MIAC JR 25 9 8 17 0.680
2016-17 Augsburg D3 MIAC SO 27 16 7 23 0.852
2015-16 Augsburg D3 MIAC FR 25 9 5 14 0.560
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2015-16 · Augsburg
+131.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15887
Forward overall
#649
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Liam Krupcyznski
Westfield State · 2024-25
0.435 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dennis Sicard
Buffalo State · 2005-06
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Shane Remenda
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2002-03
0.655 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.