IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Klatt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-05-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Cloquet High USHS-MN 25 9 16 25 1.000 0.1266 0.1216 0.2429 0.2333
2015-16 — NA3HL 35 5 6 11 0.314 0.0394 0.0406 0.0992 0.1022
2016-17 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 20 0 2 2 0.100 0.0367 0.0362 0.1056 0.1043
2017-18 Wisconsin Muskies USPHL-Premier 42 34 59 93 2.214 0.2896 0.2707 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Fitchburg State D1 MASCAC SO 2 0 1 1 0.500
2019-20 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC — 2 0 1 1 0.500
2018-19 Fitchburg State D1 MASCAC FR 7 0 2 2 0.286
2018-19 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC — 7 0 2 2 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2018-19 · Fitchburg State
+88.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9027
Forward overall
#417
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tim Faulkner
Aurora · 2015-16
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Schultz
Aurora · 2022-23
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Evan Lindquist
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2015-16
0.304 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.