| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 | Nashville Jr. Predators | NA3HL | 35 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 0.486 | 0.0585 | 0.0631 | 0.1534 | 0.1655 |
| 2016-17 | Nashville Jr. Predators | NA3HL | 45 | 23 | 33 | 56 | 1.244 | 0.1500 | 0.1543 | 0.3931 | 0.4043 |
| 2017-18 | Winkler Flyers | MJHL | 11 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.182 | 0.0514 | 0.0505 | 0.1146 | 0.1125 |
| 2018-19 | Lone Star Brahmas | NAHL | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-23 | Augsburg | D3 | MIAC | SR | 28 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 0.393 |
| 2021-22 | Augsburg | D3 | MIAC | JR | 30 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 0.267 |
| 2020-21 | Augsburg | D3 | MIAC | SO | 5 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.400 |
| 2019-20 | Augsburg | D3 | MIAC | FR | 26 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 0.462 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.