IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ben Greiner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-06-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 — BCHL 51 12 13 25 0.490 0.1908 0.1956 0.7149 0.7329
2012-13 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 29 4 1 5 0.172 0.1098 0.1047 0.5166 0.4927
2013-14 Rio Grande Valley Killer Bees NAHL 60 22 29 51 0.850 0.3156 0.2974 0.9000 0.8481
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SR 29 6 11 17 0.586
2016-17 Hobart D3 SUNYAC JR 28 7 9 16 0.571
2015-16 Bowling Green D1 WCHA SO 3 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 Bowling Green D1 WCHA FR 8 3 0 3 0.375
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2014-15 · Bowling Green
+98.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19048
Forward overall
#725
Forward born in 1993

D1 Comparables

Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Owen Sikich
Saint Mary's · 2017-18
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brad Carpenter
Wentworth · 2000-01
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Prappas
Trine · 2018-19
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.