IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jesse Brown Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-05-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 — NA3HL 46 8 12 20 0.435 0.0546 0.0561 0.1373 0.1411
2015-16 — NA3HL 43 14 14 28 0.651 0.0817 0.0800 0.2056 0.2012
2016-17 Atlanta Capitals NA3HL 45 28 45 73 1.622 0.2036 0.1890 0.5121 0.4753
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SO 20 1 2 3 0.150
2017-18 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen FR 29 1 4 5 0.172
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2017-18 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+38.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22685
Forward overall
#904
Forward born in 1996
#548
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Casper Dyrssen
Manhattanville · 2014-15
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Max Brainin
St. Norbert · 2018-19
0.464 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan McCarthy
Hamline · 2002-03
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.