IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jesse Brown Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-05-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 — NA3HL 46 8 12 20 0.435 0.0524 0.0538 0.1374 0.1412
2015-16 — NA3HL 43 14 14 28 0.651 0.0785 0.0768 0.2057 0.2013
2016-17 Atlanta Capitals NA3HL 45 28 45 73 1.622 0.1955 0.1814 0.5125 0.4756
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SO 20 1 2 3 0.150
2017-18 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen FR 29 1 4 5 0.172
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2017-18 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+44.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#32275
Forward overall
#1420
Forward born in 1996
#689
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Casper Dyrssen
Manhattanville · 2014-15
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
C.J. Valerian
New England College · 2015-16
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Max Brainin
St. Norbert · 2018-19
0.464 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.