← New Search ↗ Social Card

Max Brainin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-05-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Jersey Hitmen USPHL-Premier-Classic 30 9 7 16 0.533 0.1497 0.1583 0.4385 0.4636
2017-18 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 57 17 23 40 0.702 0.2578 0.2545 0.7407 0.7312
2018-19 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 58 20 39 59 1.017 0.3737 0.3522 1.0737 1.0119
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 8 0 3 3 0.375
2021-22 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 17 4 1 5 0.294
2020-21 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 St. Norbert D1 NCHA FR 28 4 9 13 0.464
2019-20 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 28 4 9 13 0.464
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2019-20 · St. Norbert
+73.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

68%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14979
Forward overall
#691
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wentworth · 2010-11
1.250 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2007-08
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Trine · 2018-19
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.