IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Casper Dyrssen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-05-10 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 AIK U20 SHL-J20 36 3 5 8 0.222 0.1240 0.1241 0.3202 0.3206
2013-14 Northern Cyclones EHL 42 7 12 19 0.452 0.0971 0.0963 0.2215 0.2197
2014-15 Northern Cyclones EHL 41 16 23 39 0.951 0.2041 0.1929 0.4658 0.4402
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SR 29 7 13 20 0.690
2017-18 Manhattanville D3 UCHC JR 26 3 13 16 0.615
2016-17 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SO 15 0 2 2 0.133
2015-16 Manhattanville D3 UCHC FR 10 4 1 5 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2015-16 · Manhattanville
+278.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27342
Forward overall
#1109
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nolan Ring
Fredonia · 2023-24
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Economos
Plymouth State · 2012-13
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan McCormack
Canton · 2018-19
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.