IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Payton Felix Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-05-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Northeast Generals NA3HL 13 0 3 3 0.231 0.0255 0.0255 0.0731 0.0731
2020-21 Northeast Generals NA3HL 40 21 30 51 1.275 0.1410 0.1410 0.4039 0.4039
2021-22 Northeast Generals NA3HL 41 22 23 45 1.098 0.1214 0.1127 0.3477 0.3229
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC SR 22 0 3 3 0.136
2024-25 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC JR 26 2 3 5 0.192
2023-24 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC SO 20 0 1 1 0.050
2022-23 Manhattanville D3 UCHC — 4 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25138
Forward overall
#1255
Forward born in 2001
#724
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Derek Miller
Wisconsin-Superior · 2001-02
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Christian Blomquist
Wilkes · 2021-22
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lance Malark
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2004-05
0.368 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.