IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Economos Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-05-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Michigan Warriors NAHL 51 8 9 17 0.333 0.1238 0.1223 0.3529 0.3487
2012-13 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 59 15 20 35 0.593 0.2203 0.2066 0.6281 0.5891
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SR 27 14 13 27 1.000
2015-16 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast JR 27 13 9 22 0.815
2014-15 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SO 28 13 13 26 0.929
2013-14 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast FR 27 10 10 20 0.741
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.74
2013-14 · Plymouth State
+400.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22794
Forward overall
#988
Forward born in 1992
#2364
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Paul Conter
Southern Maine · 2006-07
0.864 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Martinez
SUNY Potsdam · 2007-08
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Bohn
St. Mary's · 2005-06
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.