IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nolan Ring Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-05-16 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Timmins Rock NOJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Timmins Rock NOJHL 34 9 13 22 0.647 0.1091 0.1106 0.2689 0.2726
2022-23 Timmins Rock NOJHL 54 26 21 47 0.870 0.1467 0.1424 0.3617 0.3511
2023-24 Timmins Rock NOJHL 44 15 27 42 0.955 0.1609 0.1478 0.3966 0.3642
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Anna Maria D3 MASCAC — 21 8 10 18 0.857
2024-25 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC FR 13 1 5 6 0.462
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2024-25 · Fredonia
+270.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
42%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28622
Forward overall
#1301
Forward born in 2003
#267
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matthew Franzoi
Skidmore · 2021-22
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Doc Gentzler
SUNY Brockport · 2015-16
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ethan Nauman
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2011-12
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.