IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matthew Franzoi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-05-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 — OJHL 51 16 22 38 0.745 0.1826 0.1826 0.5130 0.5130
2020-21 Caledon Admirals OJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Burlington Cougars OJHL 49 16 29 45 0.918 0.2251 0.2072 0.6323 0.5820
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC SR 15 4 0 4 0.267
2024-25 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC JR 15 2 5 7 0.467
2023-24 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC SO 5 1 3 4 0.800
2022-23 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC FR 5 2 0 2 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2022-23 · Skidmore
+125.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20967
Forward overall
#1021
Forward born in 2001
#844
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Colin Vassallo
SUNY Oswego · 2023-24
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Paul Conter
Southern Maine · 2006-07
0.864 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Vick Schlueter
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2007-08
0.435 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.