IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Doc Gentzler Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-05-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 6 1 0 1 0.167 0.0619 0.0611 0.1765 0.1741
2015-16 Hartford Jr. Wolfpack EHL 34 9 23 32 0.941 0.2020 0.1925 0.4609 0.4393
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 SUNY Brockport D3 — SR 25 7 14 21 0.840
2018-19 SUNY Brockport D3 — JR 26 9 5 14 0.538
2017-18 SUNY Brockport D3 — SO 24 2 7 9 0.375
2016-17 SUNY Brockport D3 — FR 23 5 4 9 0.391
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2016-17 · SUNY Brockport
+226.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#26629
Forward overall
#1088
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Economos
Plymouth State · 2012-13
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Larkee
Saint John's · 2024-25
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nolan Ring
Fredonia · 2023-24
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.