IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Doc Gentzler Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-05-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 6 1 0 1 0.167 0.0612 0.0604 0.1760 0.1736
2015-16 Hartford Jr. Wolfpack EHL 34 9 23 32 0.941 0.2174 0.2072 0.4605 0.4389
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Brockport D1 — SR 25 7 14 21 0.840
2019-20 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC SR 25 7 14 21 0.840
2018-19 Brockport D1 — JR 26 9 5 14 0.538
2018-19 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC JR 26 9 5 14 0.538
2017-18 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC SO 24 2 7 9 0.375
2016-17 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC FR 23 5 4 9 0.391
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2016-17 · SUNY Brockport
+207.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21757
Forward overall
#810
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Payton Felix
Manhattanville · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Larkee
Saint John's · 2024-25
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Billy Loughnane
Morrisville · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.