IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Billy Loughnane Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-05-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Pueblo Bulls USPHL-Premier 11 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2023-24 Carolina Jr. Hurricanes USPHL-Premier 42 10 15 25 0.595 0.0779 0.0769 0.2020 0.1995
2024-25 Carolina Jr. Hurricanes USPHL-Premier 43 19 28 47 1.093 0.1430 0.1329 0.3710 0.3447
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Morrisville D3 SUNYAC FR 14 0 0 0 0.000
2025-26 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC FR 14 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
2%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24574
Forward overall
#1378
Forward born in 2004
#1759
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ross Johnson
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2004-05
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kobe Keller
Wisconsin-Stout · 2018-19
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Costley
St. Norbert · 2000-01
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.